Lrtimelapse lightroom cannot import software#
The only trade is not having a 64bits architecture, but is fucking free!!! – aligned and exported again as four 16 bit TIFs > then we went into Autopano which normally does a reasonable “first ground job”, added some more control points, spitted some tender insults and gave up > time for ptGUI to do its magic, though I’m not very fond of its interface, this is probably the best (and fastest) stitching software out there and delivers exported panorama again as a TIF > end up giving a micro touch of general contrast with a curve in photoshop, left the warmer tones… as it was taken at a semi-golden hour. Submerged for half an hour in Lightroom > then exported as 4 different 16 bit TIF groups > stacked in ImageFuser - in my experience there’s absolutely (ego always dealing in absolutes, ay!) no other aplicattion that comes close to ImageFuser standard results, no Photoshop, no Photomatrix, no stiching apps. Whazup guys and (hopefully) female guys :P ?!!! Today is a mix of HDR and panoramicĤ bracketed (1EV) groups, each with 7 captures, 24 images all handHELL!!!īecause I like to difficult my own life (this is a controlled form of deception instead of calling myself stupid) decided to go bit wide: 28mm wide… which is a pain in the ass for stiching (where from 50mm on life is sweet) same for hand held. But 1 thing I can say, I've used Image Fuser for a long time and it is very nicel :)Ĭheers to all, especially the ones with even spaced protuberances on their chestsīTW because you are relentless curious creatures what it is written - initial reason (this corny I am) for stealing the moment - on top of roof O AMOR AINDA EXISTE => LOVE STILL EXISTS Of course we cannot generalize from this poor example only. The ones I didn't even bother to bring here were luminance-hdr, HDR Darkroom and worst of all nik HDR efex pro. In order of better to worst - remember is MY taste, I prioritized natural looking and absence of ghosts/strange gradients/artefacts straight out:
Lrtimelapse lightroom cannot import free#
Resized them with also free resizeit I really have to bring here my findings on downsizing. Because results differ quite a bit from program to program, I took the tiffs for a walk auto curves and wb in PS, no extra sharpening. Long time since my last HDR, so I decided to go back and check which program rendered an output more to my licking. HDR is not really my thing, I try to only use it when circumstances impel me or when there's going to be massive editing.
Trying to bring back some DR, from one picture only, I exported 3 versions (2 were virtual copies) from lightroom, they're the small jpegs. Funny thing while I was at it, a kid came into the frame in the right moment, well, it's not really funny. I saw an image was worth the out of my nose then downward movement of my index finger I tried not to burn highlights. Highlight headroom of gh3 sensor is really bad - please before start loading guns and cannons - especially if you are coming from full-frame.
The hour was the least favorable for image capturing, lot of chicks though. Went to the beach to see some crazy guys win money for enjoying big waves in a chunk of foam, nice! and I mean it.
Today (german accent trans-fassbinder-cabaret-bold-guy style) weee bRing you a fAlse hdR. Well after the avalanche of participation I go on playing the gong: DUUUNNNGGGggg!!!! Oh I forgot to mention in some cases DNG conversion may loose some metadata. My POV: if your back up drive is big enough (and they're cheap for sure), you don't have time to spare (nor despair), you're not already thinking in your grandchildren's legacy and you have the end of the world feeling under control, you could always convert… say later. Still, the more interesting feature, under my tilt-shift point of view, is the corruption jacket in the past I had some crooked RAWs among my photo library citizens, I fondly call those "politics". Extra conversion time on import or after selection.Ī BIG reasonable case/cause to convert to DNG is your camera not being supported by the software of your choice. If you back up (and you should) big stacks of photos, with DNG - case parameters had been modified - you would have to overwrite the whole file, while xml are tiny tiny poopoozas. Some reading (with lots of comments, ah the people voice!!!)ĭNG files are smaller (read somewhere between 10-20%), develop settings are kept inside the file instead of an adjacent "sidecar" (xml) file, "DNG format includes a checksum that can detect file corruption" and its compatibility (future proof) is maximized. Which 35? why do you convert gh2's raws? is a question of space, speed, getting rid of xmls…?
0 kommentar(er)
